![]() ![]() There is also a minimal version check that will ensure that you will get an error on module load, when you already have an older version of Pester loaded in the current session. The Dll holding the configuration and other types is now versioned based on the version of Pester that it is released with. When both Run.Exit and Run.Throw are enabled throwing exception is preferred, because it is more informative and because it works better with VSCode where exit is ignored. When enabled Pester will throw when there are any failed tests. New option Run.Throw is added which is similar to Run.Exit ( -EnableExit). The help for this cmdlet is generated from the object, so includes all options that are present. NET call because it will auto-load Pester if it was not loaded already. It is recommended to be used instead of the. New-PesterConfiguration cmdlet is added which returns ::Default. CI switch does not enable CodeCoverage by default #1911.Little improvements to coverage output #1866.Please help me test it when it comes so we can make it new default! There will be also a new option coming to take advantage of the Profiler based code coverage. Invoke-Pester -Configuration $configuration If you don't mind the overhead, use this configuration to get the functionality of the -CI switch: $configuration = New-PesterConfiguration At the moment there is no stable way to make CodeCoverage fast on all versions of PowerShell so it is not a good default for beginners, or build pipelines you want to quickly setup. Lastly, the -CI switch no longer enables CodeCoverage. The format is also compatible with Azure DevOps coverage view.Īnd code here ❗ -CI no longer enables CodeCoverage This, plus some boilerplate code enables you to easily see code coverage when developing in VSCode. I added new format based on JaCoCo which is especially catered to Coverage Gutters extension in VSCode. Using CodeCoverage in VSCode is very painful and that's a shame. (See it in the gif below) VSCode + Pester CodeCoverage are now friends This has only visual effect for now, it shows as green message in the output when the target is met, or as red when it is not met. Using option CodeCoverage.CoveragePercentTarget you can now specify the desired code coverage. You can specify your desired code coverage percent ![]() Once (or if) this is merged and released Pester is ready to start using it. I also implemented CodeCoverage using the still unreleased PowerShell profiler, which I started about half a year ago, and that has been working on. This will become a new experimental option soon and should work for all versions of PowerShell that Pester supports. I did some new research and have a proof of concept using my new Profiler to do code coverage which is almost as fast as running without it. This option is enabled by default and makes the execution a bit faster as well. ![]() There is also new option, CodeCoverage.SingleHitBreakpoints, which will remove the breakpoint as soon as it is hit, lowering the overhead in PowerShell. I focused on performance as well and all breakpoints are now set in one place, making it 50% faster in my tests, but I would love to see your numbers. The CodeCoverage data are attached to the result object as well, if you want to do further processing on it. And it is always attached to the result object when CodeCoverage is enabled. I finally fixed the coverage report which is now output to the screen when Detailed (or Diagnostic) output level is specified. The theme of this release was Code Coverage. Thank you! Code coverage Coverage report is back, on screen and on the result object First of, thanks to all the contributors, especially who responded to a ton of issues, made multiple PRs, helped me diagnose problems, and checked my fixes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |